Hallo,
lanas hat gesagt: // lanas wrote:
> That's not it I think. Using a sequencer for that is like painting the
> Mona Lisa by number. Tangerine Dream surely have used some sequencers
> but a large part of their work resided in the capability to modify in
> real time what sound like 'sequences' by turning knobs and plugging
> wires as sounds were made. As such, it was really a performance, more
> than we could think in general. So I think rather they were using
> complex arpeggiators. Today we can listen to that and write it down in
> a MIDI file, but that's not what I'm looking for.
The modern equivalent to what you describe could be live coding in Pd,
SuperCollider etc., e.g. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zKzxqN5mUI or
http://vimeo.com/5272693
Ciao
-- Frank _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Sun Feb 7 16:15:02 2010
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Feb 07 2010 - 16:15:02 EET