Re: [LAU] Distribution Usage?

From: Ng Oon-Ee <ngoonee@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Sat May 15 2010 - 03:38:15 EEST

On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 14:12 -0700, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
> On 14 May 2010 at 22:40, Jean-Baptiste Mestelan <mestelan@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > On 14 May 2010 19:03, Folderol <folderol@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > > Don't forger 64studio either
> > > ... which I believe is on the verge of a new release :)
> >
> > OK, all in all, don't forget to check
> > http://www.linux-sound.org/distro.html
>
> Yeah, but some of that is a little outdated. For instance, Thac's
> RPMs for Mandrake, is a bit old. Mandrake became Mandriva, and Thac
> went on to create PCLinuxOS as an alternative.
>
> Thanks tho....
>
> --
For those who want the latest of just about everything, Arch is not too
bad. More DIY from the audio perspective though, there IS an audio repo
but I think it seriously lacks manpower to do updating. I do have 40+
packages, more than half audio-related which I 'compile from source',
but Arch's AUR (user-submitted PKGBUILDs to generate packages) makes
that easy except for the wait-time of compiling, dependency-checking and
such are all done in the PKGBUILD.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sat May 15 04:15:03 2010

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat May 15 2010 - 04:15:03 EEST