On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 1:47 PM, Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net>wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 22:01 -1000, david wrote:
> > I've been told that Gnome3 desktop uses 1GB RAM without running
> > anything else.
>
> AFAIK this isn't true, but when Debian updated my GNOME 2 to GNOME 3 a
> long time ago, GNOME 3 and GNOME 3 in "fake GNOME 2" mode did need much
> more CPU resources, than GNOME 2 did need.
>
> Xfce4 and LXDE anyway do provide the common workflow, that is used by
> studios. I guess most engineers are accustomed to a workflow similar to
> KDE3, GNOME2, Win 98 se, Win XP etc..
>
> IMO both, Xfce and LXDE are very good to use and I don't miss that much
> of what I was accustomed to, when I used GNOME 2. I recommend not to use
> GNOME 3.
>
> 0.02€,
> Ralf
>
Ive been running upgrading on a debian (testing) system.
Then one day I saw the dreaded word "pulseaudio" in the list of proposed
updates and I quickly hit the Ctrl-C. Been much more careful about
updating/upgrading thereafter.
So is the recommended solution to stay with xfce now and ditch gnome?
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun May 6 20:15:02 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun May 06 2012 - 20:15:02 EEST