Re: [LAU] Audio Interface for live Processing

From: Len Ovens <len@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Jan 28 2013 - 00:32:23 EET

On Sun, January 27, 2013 12:20 pm, James Stone wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Saul Rayson <saul@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

>>>For live work, Guitar effects, soft synths, etc. USB 1.1 at 16bit/48k
>>> may
>>>work just fine
>>
>> My experience with USB audio is limited, but USB 1 on mac, for live
>> processing, I have found to have unusable latency.
>>
>
> Latency in 1.1 vs usb 2 shouldn't be significantly different as I
> understand it. usb 2 just allows higher bandwidth - so more channels
> or 24bit vs 16bit. Just depends on whether the interface is properly
> supported in linux.

I have used a USB 1.1 IF on my netbook running at 800Mhz (half speed) and
was still able to run the IF at -p 64 -n 2 (2.67 ms Latency) without
xruns. I did have to back the latency off if I ran too many softsynths or
too many effects, but even double that is not bad. -p 64 with USB 2
devices seems to be the lowest too. I run into memory problems before CPU
use problems in general with only 1G memory :)

-- 
Len Ovens
www.OvenWerks.net
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Jan 28 00:15:04 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 28 2013 - 00:15:04 EET