Re: [LAU] Some new Bach

From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net>
Date: Wed Feb 13 2013 - 12:21:03 EET

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net>
To: linux-audio-user <linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden>
Subject: Re: [LAU] Some new Bach
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 02:42:23 +0100

-------- Forwarded Message --------
From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf@email-addr-hidden-dsl.net>
To: linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
Subject: Re: [LAU] Some new Bach
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 23:32:17 +0100

On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 23:14 +0100, Julien Claassen wrote:
> gear nerds

:p

When I was young I bought a Peavy KB-300, an odd amp, I don't use it
anymore, but I borrow it a friend, so it's still in use. When I bought
the amp, the dealer had a cheap second-hand (I'm old, but not that old)
ARP Odyssey, but I wasn't aware that it would have been a better choice
to buy the synth instead and in addition another amp, e.g. a Roland
Cube.

"Gear nerd" is swearing ;). It's simply that those synth do sound
amazing, when you play them. On recordings the difference between those
monsters and virtual synth often isn't that big, but when playing live,
comparing a real synth and some virtual synth is hardcore. To mix a song
it's always easier to use a mix of a few monster synth and some less
good synth or virtual synth, than using only monsters or only crappy
sound generators.

Can't listen to it now. I'm already interested to hear Dave's
"restoration" ASAP.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Feb 13 12:15:06 2013

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 13 2013 - 12:15:06 EET