Re: [LAU] Session management with NSM

From: Philipp Überbacher <murks@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Sep 04 2014 - 00:08:03 EEST

On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 20:27:11 +0100
Harry van Haaren <harryhaaren@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 7:57 PM, J. Liles <malnourite@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> > workflow that is already supported just fine by dealing
> > with it 'manually'.
> Yes, manually setting JACK before starting a session is the only and
> best solution that scales. As you mentioned, transporting a session
> to another machine would mean JACK's settings get borked: therefor
> this is *not* something NSM should worry about, or implement.

I completely disagree. Moving the session from one machine to another
may be one use case, but a rather special one. At least it's not
something I would do.
On the other hand, remembering which jack settings are required for
which session is something that NSM should remember for me.
And given that I proposed the jackstart client as an optional client,
something you can use or not use, same as jackconnect, your argument
falls flat on its face since you could just not use the jackstart
client and still handle jack manually.

You would also not need to start all clients in a pre-defined order,
you'd just need to make sure that jackstart starts before all others.

And be honest about one point: How many clients manage to 'live
switch'? I guess that most don't. Even if they do, what's the cost? A
few seconds at session switch time at most, which is completely
negligible IMHO. I know that for you this is a feature that is
important because other session management systems don't do it, but I
seriously doubt that it matters for any other reason.

Regards,
Philipp
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Thu Sep 4 00:15:06 2014

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Sep 04 2014 - 00:15:07 EEST