Gradus Ad Parnassum is a really bad method, musically as well as
pedagogical, with little connection to the actual counterpoint methods
of the 16th century (or later).
It leads to music that you cannot find anywhere in the real music world.
I doubt any of the composers you mentioned actually used that. If you
think so otherwise it needs more than claiming that they did. Show
falsifiable evidence.
Nils
On 10/27/2015 01:15 PM, David Santamauro wrote:
>
>
> On 10/27/2015 06:23 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>>> On 27.10.2015, at 06:16, Luigino Bracci <lbracci@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>>
>> Resume: If you want to play hobby music in the style of other artists
>> some software tools make it easy to do so, but you never will find
>> your individual style. If you want to make art, you have to find your
>> own sound, this is time consuming and comes with a long learning
>> curve, you can't do it as easy as playing hobby music.
>
> Simply amazing that the likes of Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, Berlioz,
> Chopin, Rosini, Paganini, Liszt, Brahms and numerous others (including
> myself) spanning 2 centuries used the same counterpoint "tool"[1] to
> learn and yet somehow managed to develop their own individual style. Of
> course, we look back on history and study the influence such a treatise
> had on their style but I don't think you will find anyone claiming each
> wasn't individual.
>
> A tool is a tool. It doesn't create, hamper or destroy artistry.
>
> David
>
> [1] Gradus Ad Parnassum, Johann Joseph Fux
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Oct 27 16:15:01 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Oct 27 2015 - 16:15:01 EET