Re: [LAU] Is there a newer, better "Jack Rack"?

From: Hermann Meyer <brummer-@web.de>
Date: Sun Nov 08 2015 - 04:55:38 EET

Am 08.11.2015 um 03:42 schrieb Len Ovens:
> On Sun, 8 Nov 2015, Hermann Meyer wrote:
>
>> Am 07.11.2015 um 21:25 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
>>> It's just strange that there still is an issue with Linuxsampler's GPL.
>>
>> The GPL explicitly forbids any additional restrictions.
>
> So if they were to call it "the licence" and use gpl like language it
> would be a fresh licence with no "additions". Then it would be ok?
>
> --
> Len Ovens
> www.ovenwerks.net
>

I'm not a lawyer, but I know that's the reason why linuxsampler never
get included into debian.
Given the licence a other name wouldn't change that fact, as it is
simply not compatible with the
DFSG, regardless how you name it.

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Sun Nov 8 08:15:02 2015

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Nov 08 2015 - 08:15:02 EET