On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:00:47 +0000
Will Godfrey <willgodfrey@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:58:09 -0500
> "jonetsu@email-addr-hidden" <jonetsu@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
> > There's one thing clear though. If you have a sine wave with say 16
> > sampling points, much of the curves will be lost. If this is saved
> > to a file and the file is resampled with 128 sampling points, it
> > will not add the curves. The original is gone, the resampling does
> > not know about the original source, it cannot and it will not make
> > it up.
>
> Although it seems counter-intuitive that actually is quite wrong!
Hmmmm. Not sure about intuition. A sine wave with 16 sampled points
will end up like a linked list of edges. Saving that to file and
resampling at 128 will only add points to the straight lines. It will
not create curves as per the original. It cannot. How would it know it
was a sine wave and not a guitar tone when it had to process basically
what was a robotic tone ?
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Mon Nov 23 20:15:06 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 23 2015 - 20:15:06 EET