On 23 November 2015 at 17:08, jonetsu@email-addr-hidden <jonetsu@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:00:47 +0000
> Will Godfrey <willgodfrey@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:58:09 -0500
>> "jonetsu@email-addr-hidden" <jonetsu@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>>
>> > There's one thing clear though. If you have a sine wave with say 16
>> > sampling points, much of the curves will be lost. If this is saved
>> > to a file and the file is resampled with 128 sampling points, it
>> > will not add the curves. The original is gone, the resampling does
>> > not know about the original source, it cannot and it will not make
>> > it up.
>>
>> Although it seems counter-intuitive that actually is quite wrong!
>
> Hmmmm. Not sure about intuition. A sine wave with 16 sampled points
> will end up like a linked list of edges. Saving that to file and
> resampling at 128 will only add points to the straight lines. It will
> not create curves as per the original. It cannot. How would it know it
> was a sine wave and not a guitar tone when it had to process basically
> what was a robotic tone ?
Interpolation?!
-- Neil C Smith Artist : Technologist : Adviser http://neilcsmith.net Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org Digital Prisoners - interactive spaces and projections - www.digitalprisoners.co.uk _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Mon Nov 23 20:15:06 2015
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Nov 23 2015 - 20:15:06 EET