Re: [LAU] which lau distro is more commandline friendly?

From: Karen Lewellen <klewellen@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Dec 22 2015 - 01:48:33 EET

Why did this discussion shift to my hardware synthesizer when I am asking
about distributions specifically written for audio professionals?
Let me post a link to an article that illustrates what I am asking about.
Linux does not support the reading edge, since you asked.
Kare

On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, F. Silvain wrote:

> Hey hey Kare,
> not having followed the thread completely, I'd like to say this: I use Debian
> Squeeze and it works. There are enough commandline tools. ArchLinux seems to
> offer an even better commandline structure in some ways. I'm not sure about
> Nama and Midish for ArchLinux, I know, that there is a Nama package for
> Debian. In any case, you'd need to update this manually to the most recent
> version to have some real fun.
>
> I'm not sure about lowlatency kernels for Debian and Arch. But I think, you
> can get a lowlatency kernel from Ubuntu for Debian, though it might be a
> little awkward. I'm usng a standard kernel and the latency is quite OK.
>
> Which hardware synth do you use for speec? If it was supported by Linux, it
> usually still is, they rarely throw stuff away. :) Support would either be
> directly in the kernel or in BRLTTY, the braille driver. It not only supports
> braille displays, but also speech hard- and software.
>
> Espeak, the free Linux speech synth, is not very pleasant, but usable.
>
> Ta-ta
> ----
> Ffanci
> * Homepage: https://freeshell.de/~silvain
> * Twitter: http://twitter.com/ffanci_silvain
> * GitHub: https://github.com/fsilvain
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Dec 22 04:15:02 2015

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 22 2015 - 04:15:02 EET