Re: [LAU] which lau distro is more commandline friendly?

Hi Ralf, others.

I am referring to distributions such as those referenced here:

http://libremusicproduction.com/articles/advantages-choosing-audio-orientated-linux-distribution

Granted I am told one benefit of such distributions is that the
compiling work is already done, including choosing a low latency
kernel. However there are some repositories or tools that can
be added like the Liquorix repositories in Debian?

yes, i know all Linux distributions share common elements.
what I am asking is which distros among the sort referenced in the
article
above, are going to be already compiled with an easy door to the
command line?
Or, does one just run a keyboard command like Lyn <I think > provided?

speaking only for myself, I do not feel very good about Ubuntu, but still.
Hope this tightens focus on my actual question lol.
Karen

  On Tue, 22 Dec 2015, Ralf Mardorf wrote:

> On Mon, 21 Dec 2015 18:48:33 -0500 (EST), Karen Lewellen wrote:
>> distributions specifically written for audio professionals
>
> Software for Linux distributions isn't individually written for a
> distro, excepted of a few tools, such as package management tools.
> Distros are collections of software written to run together with a Linux
> kernel, but this software could be used by every distro.
>
> Audio distros usually are derivatives of a major non-audio distro.
>
> The difference between distros is the policy regarding
> - licenses
> - the package management
> - the way software is upgraded or not upgraded
>
> As already pointed out by Len, command line isn't an issue for any
> distro, the default login shell for most, if not all distros most
> likely is bash. The sh link for some older distros might default to
> dash, but usually defaults to bash either. Other shells are very
> unusual for Linux.
>
> For command line work you should be able to be aware of bash and it's
> safe to know the differences to dash, but that isn't that hard, other
> shells are unimportant. This is the same for all distros. Regarding
> command line the differences between distros are mostly package
> management related tools.
>
> There are few minor differences that are unimportant, e.g. the source
> for /bin/su has impact to the way variables get reset. This not really
> has much impact to the command line usage.
>
> IOW you need to take a look at the policies of the distros. If you want
> to compile software from upstream, what is required to do this? Latest
> versions of libraries or are older versions ok? Is the policy of the
> distro to provide upgrades close to upstream, or is the policy to
> provide a steady work-flow by only providing security related upgrades?
> Etc. ... I already gave a few hints by my previous reply.
>
>> Why did this discussion shift to my hardware synthesizer
>
> F. Silvain likely mentions BRLTTY, because you mentioned that you need
> old kernels to use your synth.
> --
> http://www.grundgesetz-gratis.de/
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>
>
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Dec 22 04:15:02 2015