Re: [LAU] Look ma, I'm in the paper :)

From: jonetsu <jonetsu@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Tue Nov 01 2016 - 15:54:44 EET

On Tue, 1 Nov 2016 14:08:36 +0100
Massimo Barbieri <massimo@email-addr-hidden> wrote:

> Can you use proprietary software without any limits? Can you study the
> source code of a proprietary software? Can you modify the proprietary
> software? Can you redistribute proprietary software?

1) Yes.

2) No. I want to make music, not dispute algorithms. When I put my
nose in source code is to get paid, to bring bread and butter to the
table. When I'm, not paid, I like to make music. And biking, and
various fun things.

3) No. See 2).

4) No. I believe people has a right to earn a living.

>> You could very well sell your music made with Open Source software.
>> The FLOSS license should not apply to the products made with the
>> software itself.
 
> I can assure that I can apply to my music any license I want :-)

Exactly.

> I chose a Creative Commons license Attribution, Share alike
> (CC-BY-SA) and I used this license to publish final mix, single
> recordings tracks and Ardour project that are a sort of "source code"
> of our music. This is my way to say thanks to developers who wrote
> Ardour, Hydrogen, CALF and many others great software ad free
> software.

And there can be a time also when one will want to make money. Why
not ?

Ciao.

--
NP: "Multiverso" - Deus ex machina (Official video, Bologna, October
2016) - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRrDJntwsa8
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue Nov 1 16:15:05 2016

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Nov 01 2016 - 16:15:05 EET