On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 16:32:18 +0200, Peter wrote:
>wouldn't that be on >80ms latency. If that's the order where
>'disturbing' starts then I find that number interesting, as (if I
>remember correctly) that's the fastest scale a human can react.
[rocketmouse@email-addr-hidden ~]$ bpm2ms 90 | grep 1/32
(60000ms/90BPM)*4*(1/32)= ~83.33333333333333333333ms
So this would be 1/32 note at 90 BPM. This is something a musician
should notice, let alone that artists are not seldom "freaks", e.g.
savants, autists etc., some even without being aware to "suffer" from
autism or something similar.
>But brain might be cheating in assuming having played
We are at least aware of what was played already before, what already
is "processed" by the brain. So I wouldn't it call it "cheating", but
what we are doing is based on "extrapolation". You were to late, the
brain takes a while to notice this and then you compensate it. A good
musician isn't to late, a beginner often is out of time.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Fri Mar 31 20:15:02 2017
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Mar 31 2017 - 20:15:02 EEST