On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 15:59:42 -0600
"Chris Caudle" <chris@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
>On Tue, December 26, 2017 2:34 pm, Will Godfrey wrote:
>> It seems everyone is dropping support for 32 bit machines these days -
>
>64 bit x86 based processors were first released over 12 years ago. I
>don't think you have been able to buy a 32 bit only x86 processor for over
>5 years now, so the numbers of 32 bit only machines is dwindling.
>
>> It makes me wonder how long it will be before single core machines go the
>> same way.
>
>That depends on what you mean. You have not been able to purchase a new
>single core processor in quite a few years. As far as I am aware there
>are no distributions which build without SMP support, but an SMP capable
>kernel can run on a single core, so the situation with core count is not
>quite the same as the difference between 32 bit and 64 bit builds.
>
OK, I wasn't thinking things through clearly.
Presumably if a program did want to spread itself between cores it would have
to first ask how many there were, and if it was 1, then that settled it!
-- Will J Godfrey http://www.musically.me.uk Say you have a poem and I have a tune. Exchange them and we can both have a poem, a tune, and a song. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-user mailing list Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden https://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-userReceived on Wed Dec 27 04:15:04 2017
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Dec 27 2017 - 04:15:04 EET