Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour-0.99.8 tarball released

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] ardour-0.99.8 tarball released
From: Steve Harris (S.W.Harris_AT_ecs.soton.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Dec 07 2000 - 18:12:32 EET


On Thu, Dec 07, 2000 at 10:37:08AM -0500, Paul Barton-Davis wrote:
> I don't see why we would want 2 sets of bounds. If there is no useful
> "real" bound, then just use the existing bound. If there is a "real"
> bound, then the GUI should be using it. However, I do think that a
> default is a good idea. The alternatives (use lower, upper or middle
> or range, or random value) are all poor.

I can see the argument for a default value, but a standardised (XML?)
format for expressing presets would be more useful.

Not keen to get back into XML pros and cons, but... ;)

- Steve


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu Dec 07 2000 - 19:17:27 EET