Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: Cecilia sources
From: Dave Phillips (dlphilp_AT_bright.net)
Date: Fri Dec 29 2000 - 23:55:05 EET
Maurizio Umberto Puxeddu wrote:
> Apart from hiding the sources, what should be the reason for compiling
> Cecilia?
> Speed improvements?
I think that was true when Cecilia was first developed. I've been
advised that the performance improvement now is just marginal on fast
machines. Plus, Tcl is better now too.
> ...I guess that tcl2c
> is not a real "tcl to c" converter. It probably just generates a C
> program that executes your script (Cecilia) in an embedded TCL
> intepreter. So probably there will be no speed gain. The only gain in
> this field comes from tclcruncher.
>
> Am I wrong?
My impression was that it created a standalone C program for compiling,
I don't know about an embedded Tcl interpreter. There are a few
different tcl2c progs out there...
Best regards,
== Dave Phillips
The Book Of Linux Music & Sound at http://www.nostarch.com/lms.htm
The Linux Soundapps Site at http://sound.condorow.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Dec 30 2000 - 00:33:55 EET