Re: [linux-audio-dev] RFC: reply-to address default to LAD (was: Re: Reply-To)

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] RFC: reply-to address default to LAD (was: Re: Reply-To)
From: David Olofson (david_AT_gardena.net)
Date: Fri Mar 17 2000 - 21:55:28 EST


On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, James McCartney wrote:
> I also don't like to have replies to my emails come to me both from the
> sender and the list. I get two responses to everything. Why should I have to
> edit the headers when the default behaviour of every other mailing list
> makes this unecessary?

I agree. If I want to reply to the list only (which should be enough
in most cases), I have to Reply All and then clean out the To:
field... Not very smooth.

//David

.- M u C o S --------------------------------. .- David Olofson ------.
| A Free/Open Multimedia | | Audio Hacker |
| Plugin and Integration Standard | | Linux Advocate |
`------------> http://www.linuxdj.com/mucos -' | Open Source Advocate |
.- A u d i a l i t y ------------------------. | Singer |
| Rock Solid Low Latency Signal Processing | | Songwriter |
`---> http://www.angelfire.com/or/audiality -' `-> david_AT_linuxdj.com -'


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sat Mar 18 2000 - 06:44:29 EST