Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA Specs ?
From: Richard Guenther (rguenth_AT_tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de)
Date: Sun May 12 2002 - 18:56:31 EEST
On Sun, 12 May 2002, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> On Sat, 11 May 2002, Likai Liu wrote:
>
> > Please consider my proposal for array extension of the LADSPA:
>
> As the one who encouraged to "show the code", I feel obliged to give at
> least some feedback, but I'm afraid it's not very positive this time. The
> proposal itself looks fine, but I'm not sure how much interest this gets
> from developers of current LADSPA hosts.
>
> For instance ecasound's own plugin system (on top of which LADSPA plugins
> are mapped) doesn't support arrays, so it would be a major change to add
> support for this feature. On the other hand ecasound already has a
> mechanisms in place for representing envelopes (sequences of control data
> changes) and large parameter sets (ecasound plugins can change their
> parameter interface dynamically during runtime).
>
> So this is my view on the issue. Let's see what other people think...
Speaking for GLAME the issues are similar - envelopes are handled as
separate stream of data. So this LADSPA extension does not make sense
to me.
Richard.
-- Richard Guenther <richard.guenther_AT_uni-tuebingen.de> WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/ The GLAME Project: http://www.glame.de/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun May 12 2002 - 18:48:31 EEST