On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 04:02:23PM +0100, Pieter Palmers wrote:
> indeed, but do you have an alternative? It's sort-of a chicken-and-egg
> issue. Back when jack was conceived, there were no jack clients either. So
> you didn't have anything to 'talk to' either (important exception: a
> soundcard).
Right :-)
> If we can come up with something 'better than MIDI', it could be
> interesting. Especially since these days a lot of audio stuff doesn't leave
> the pc anyway. The only thing tying us to MIDI are the external devices.
> And if the 'better than MIDI' can be downgraded to plain MIDI you have
> something to talk with.
That is exacly what I have in mind. I'll gather the bits and pieces I
have during the WE and come up with a proposal...
-- FA Laboratorio di Acustica ed Elettroacustica Parma, Italia Lascia la spina, cogli la rosa. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-devReceived on Sat Jan 19 04:15:03 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 19 2008 - 04:15:03 EET