Re: [LAD] [Jack-Devel] JACK & MIDI

From: Paul Davis <paul@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Fri Jan 18 2008 - 18:29:42 EET

On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 16:02 +0100, Pieter Palmers wrote:
> indeed, but do you have an alternative? It's sort-of a chicken-and-egg
> issue. Back when jack was conceived, there were no jack clients either.
> So you didn't have anything to 'talk to' either (important exception: a
> soundcard).

i don't know that it matters, but this is not strictly how it happened.
JACK was developed out of Ardour's initial AudioEngine object. As a
result, when the first version of JACK was available, Ardour could
already use it. how much of an incentive or disincentive this was to
JACK's adoption is probably not relevant.

--p

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Sat Jan 19 04:15:03 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Jan 19 2008 - 04:15:03 EET