Re: [LAD] LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer

From: Steve Harris <steve@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Wed Jan 23 2008 - 11:59:50 EET

On 23 Jan 2008, at 00:50, Christian Schoenebeck wrote:
>
> Calm down guys, Benno is just a bit frustrated about the apparently
> low
> interest of LV2 becoming a broad standard. The misplaced attributes
> here and
> there are just caused by this frustration, and hey, it's quite
> pointless to
> argue about this issue, because it's not our business anyway. :)
> I'm sure the Reaper guys will seek a dicussion theirselfes in case
> they're
> really interested in the LV2 issue.

That's fair enough, but it's very early in the day, LV2 has only been
finalised for a few weeks, and it's not even widely adopted internally
by LAD people, so I wouldn't expect commercial software people to be
that interested yet.

To my mind it's better for us to develop a large suite of tools and
plugins to demonstrate the viability and advantages before we go
courting other implementations. There are bound to be changes and
additions made to libslv2 to make it easier on implementers.

- Steve
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Wed Jan 23 12:15:03 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 23 2008 - 12:15:03 EET