Re: [LAD] LV2 " isn't well thought out ?" LV2 in the Reaper sequencer

From: Arnold Krille <arnold@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Thu Jan 24 2008 - 23:04:34 EET

Am Donnerstag, 24. Januar 2008 schrieb Krzysztof Foltman:
> Paul Davis wrote:
> > You read it wrong. For two different reasons. First, the same mistake
> > than Arnold made earlier. The GPL (whatever version) is the text that
> > lays out the terms of a license. Anyone can refer to this text but then
> > add exceptions, extensions. I can even say "Its licensed under the terms
> > of GPLv3 excluding every clause, plus the follow paragraph...".
> Well, what's more, at least one well known project from Free Software
> Foundation uses exactly that: GPL plus "special exception" changing the
> conditions slightly (allowing for use in other software without making
> them covered by GPL).
> I think it may be a good reason to think that such practices are
> allowed/approved by FSF.

That is called the LGPL...

Arnold

-- 
visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me 
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a "rm -rf /". Or ask your 
administrator to do so...

_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev

Received on Fri Jan 25 00:15:43 2008

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 25 2008 - 00:15:44 EET