On Thursday 24 January 2008 13:09:55 Bob Ham wrote:
> > In a debug version, it could be desirable, but for "production" use
> > (sorry for webspeak) it is unacceptable. It should be as fault-tolerant
> > as possible in those situations.
>
> Yes, you're right, JACK should be as fault tolerant as possible :-)
I believe everyone on this list agrees on that. Would you have any ideas for
improving the current situation? I have the impression that JACK should be
able to produce a lot more debug on demand than it currently does; maybe this
could ease the bug hunting?
Juuso
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Fri Jan 25 16:15:05 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 25 2008 - 16:15:05 EET