Re: [LAD] What if a fork is not a fork?

From: drew Roberts <zotz@email-addr-hidden>
Date: Mon Jan 31 2011 - 18:30:32 EET

On Saturday 29 January 2011 15:14:32 Raymond Martin wrote:
> > Just because the licenses don't mention being nice, acting with little
> > courtesy when it comes to using the code written by others won't hurt.
> > Otherwise I agree with you.
>
> It won't hurt, but is not required in any way, shape, or form. And that is
> what people on this list are making a fuss about. They acting like it is
> absolutely required. That just shows ignorance of what FOSS is and that
> they cannot read licenses properly.

Not so sure about that. I think some people are saying that the licenses were
not followed. Perhaps I misread.

all the best,

drew
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-dev mailing list
Linux-audio-dev@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
Received on Mon Jan 31 20:15:06 2011

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Jan 31 2011 - 20:15:06 EET