Subject: Re: Soundfonts / iiwu tuning (was[linux-audio-user] midi)
From: Peter Hanappe (peter_AT_hanappe.com)
Date: Mon Dec 10 2001 - 12:32:39 EET
I was out of reach of modern technology last week :) so
I just found the emails about the iiwusynth last night.
I'll try to make some time this week to make a clean distribution,
update the web site and check the various problems. I'll keep you
informed.
Thanks for the feedback,
Peter
Larry Troxler wrote:
> Frank Barknecht wrote:
>
>>Larry Troxler hat gesagt: // Larry Troxler wrote:
>>
>>
>>>One possibility, Peter Hanappe wrote me this:
>>>
>>>>There are some newer versions available thru the
>>>>http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/iiwusynth web site.
>>>>The latest version must 0.0.5 or 0.0.6. Careful, though,
>>>>I noticed that I have been too quick with this version
>>>>as it still contains a bug. (I guess the pointer in the
>>>>sample buffer outruns the buffer...) It's still waiting
>>>>to be fixed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>Now I tried iiwu-0.0.5, and the tuning problem went away, AFAIH(ear). A
>>link from www.iiwu.org to the gnu site would be nice, tough. How should one
>>know about this?
>>
>>
> AFAIH - I like it!
>
> Peter wrote to me that he hasn't had much time to concentrate on iiwu,
> so perhaps that's why the www.iiwu.org site isn't current. But my
> perspective is that we shouldn't complain, because what he has already
> contributed seems to be working most of the way, and I would imagine
> that it took a lot of time. (In case you might misread this, I'm *not*
> accusing you of complaining!)
>
> I haven't tried the newer versions because I was afraid of the buffer
> overflow bug he mentioned - I wasn't sure whether it was a newly
> introduced bug or not. But I take it that you haven't been bitten by it.
>
>>From your experience with this new version, should I repost the PD iiwu
> extern (which I should rename to iiwu~) with this newer version?
>
> Larry
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Dec 10 2001 - 11:08:33 EET