Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Newcomer to the list
From: Anahata (anahata_AT_treewind.co.uk)
Date: Tue Jul 22 2003 - 10:48:00 EEST
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:38:08PM -0400, Jesse Chappell wrote:
> Sweep has a great interface, but it still has one significant
> downside: all the audio is loaded into memory. This prevents
> the effective editing of large soundfiles or sessions unless you
> have a ton of memory (or it will swap all over you).
Is there a significant difference between having (a) the audio editing
program or (b) the memory manager decide what to keep in physical memory
and what to swap to disk?
-- Anahata anahata_AT_treewind.co.uk Tel: 01638 720444 http://www.treewind.co.uk Mob: 07976 263827
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Jul 22 2003 - 10:58:10 EEST