On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 02:06:20PM +0000, Dubphil wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 11:46:17AM +0100, Frank Barknecht wrote:
> > Hallo,
> > I just wonder: Why don't you record in ecasound? I'd say, running MuSE
> > just for recording could be a bit overkill. And ecasound is a really
> > useful and stable recording software and also very configurable.
> Thanks Frank to point me on that, sorry for having bad reflex inherited
> from a too long Windows music utilisation :)
> Promise I will make a desintoxication cure of graphical frontend !
> So as you said ecasound is a charm for this :
> with this :
> ecasound -G:jack,recasound,notransport -i jack -o dubphil-live.wav
ecasound ...... -o dubphil-live-`date +%Y-%m%d-%H%M`.wav
-record for a while
-ctrl-c, up-arrow, enter
starts a new file stamped with YYYY-MMDD-HHMM time stamp.
Not quite one key, but I find it fairly convenient. Though, I am not
using it in a live setting.
> I would like a minimum of human interaction like just hitting one key,
> I've got not enough time during the live act to rename the next file for the
> ecasound command and stop the running ecasound with ctrl-c. Perhaps I
> will upgrade my RAM to 1Go; I think it is the memory the guilty isn't it
> ?
-- Eric Dantan Rzewnicki | Systems Administrator Technical Operations Division | Radio Free Asia 2025 M Street, NW | Washington, DC 20036 | 202-530-4900 CONFIDENTIAL COMMUNICATION This e-mail message is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. Any unauthorized dissemination, distribution, or copying is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact network@email-addr-hidden.Received on Mon Mar 21 20:15:11 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 21 2005 - 20:15:12 EET