-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:03:15PM -0600, Josh Lawrence wrote:
> On 2/21/07, Dave Phillips <dlphillips@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> >I apologize for writing something that reads like a selfish whine (my
> >estimation), I really didn't mean it to come off like that. I'm not
> >dependent upon the magazine, I'm sure the decision was made for
> >perfectly legitimate reasons, and I can look elsewhere for funding.
>
> Sorry, I'll say on the outset that I'm not too smart sometimes. It
> seems to me that this conversation started with, "Gnome and KDE are
> dying, and thus Linux along with it." And now we are to, "Linux audio
> is dying." This isn't a snipe at anyone, but a genuine question - why
WTF??
I can't stand either Gnome or KDE. I would never willingly use either. I love my ion3 setup. There are dozens of other really good window managers too, like larswm, icewm, ratpoison, etc.
And for flashy/GUI stuff, I'm told that Beryl rocks/rules/owns/etc., so there will be plenty of innovative new stuff for Linux users who like their GUI's all gooey. Perhaps it's good news for all camps if Gnome/KDE die off.
For audio work, I view both Gnome and KDE as irrelevant. I have seen some gorgeous screenshots of Ardour runnign under Beryl but it's really not my kind of work environment.
Sure the QT and libglib wiget sets are great, and I'm glad that audio apps use them, and I expect they'll continue to be maintained and extended, but the *desktop* is in my view completely tangential to that.
I can't imagine Linux Audio's fate being tied to any particular windowmanager or desktop. It seems absurd.
- -ken
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFF3JwDe8HF+6xeOIcRApS6AJ49YN4PBTDZcPYKJSVvCcS1jnzXAwCggnTZ
3WmpRREdYe5YxRagXGzJ1Ng=
=kFyW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thu Feb 22 00:15:01 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Feb 22 2007 - 00:15:01 EET