Re: [LAU] [OT] apologies for cross-posting

I'm with you, Chuck!

On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 1:50 AM, Charles Henry <czhenry@email-addr-hidden> wrote:
> I really wish everyone would stop saying they "apologize for cross posting"
> to multiple lists. It's dumb.
>
> It's a common practice. So why would you want to apologize for it? What
> fraction of list readers are actually bothered by cross posting?
> What other activities do you apologize for, as you're doing it? "Uhhh... I
> know I'm not supposed to do this, but I'm going to--I'm sorry--do it
> anyway." If it's bad ettiquette, you wouldn't be doing it in the first
> place, right?
> People know the difference between relevant announcements and spamming. If
> I need to know if a message has been cross-posted, I check the recipients.
>
> This is just my opinion: all I can do is try to convince you not to keep
> spreading the word virus.
>
> Chuck
>
> Note: this message was not cross-posted, even though I considered it :)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-audio-user mailing list
> Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
> http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
>

-- 
Renick Bell
- http://renickbell.net
- http://twitter.com/renick
- http://the3rd2nd.com
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user