Hi Flo,
This is what was said:
"The MF-I and MF-II's AD/DA conversion latencies vary slightly (MF-II is
slightly quicker) - you won't get "Sample accurate" I/O across MF-I to
MF-II"
You mention the multiface 2 is faster too. Will there be a
problem-causing delay between the multiface 1 and 2 channels, a
difference in sound quality, or both?
What would be your suggestion for 16 outs on linux?
I'm not necessarily limited to expanding upon the Multiface/HDSP that I
already have for this project, although saving money is certainly a good
thing!
Thanks,
Iain
Em Ter, 2013-05-14 às 06:34 +0200, Florian Faber escreveu:
> The Multiface 1 and 2 have different converters. Depending on what you
> want to achieve, this is probably not what you want (the converters in
> the Multiface 2 are faster).
>
> What do you mean with "the sync wouldn't be sample-accurate"? Multiple
> cards can be started and stopped at exactly the same buffer position.
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@lists.linuxaudio.org
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Tue May 14 12:15:02 2013
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 14 2013 - 12:15:02 EEST