On 10/19/2016 12:19 AM, jonetsu wrote:
> Making it a distributed knowledge would not be realistic (TM) at all.
User: Guys, give me the dire straits!
EQ: Hey Overdrive, I'll add the brightness if you add distortion.
Overdrive: I'm in, dude.
Reverb: I'll be your reverb and we'll sound like brothers in arms
EQ: Deal.
Overdrive: EQ, please engage that low-shelf of yours I'm a bit bassy today.
Picard: Make it so.
:-)
You not only need a protocol, but a complete language for detailed
behavioral description of all building blocks. e.g. "How does a given
effect affect the signal phase depending on <parameter-set>".
I don't see plugin auto-config happen with a random set of plugins
anytime soon, and certainly not in a decentralized way with decision
logic built into the respective plugins. Then again, that would be a
cool project, maybe ask the DeepMind team.
Realistically it'll be a fixed set of plugin, the analysis tool has
pre-shared knowledge about the available DSP + parameter behavior and it
is trained (neural network, heuristics, presets,..) specifically for
those plugins.
2c,
robin
_______________________________________________
Linux-audio-user mailing list
Linux-audio-user@email-addr-hidden
http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-user
Received on Wed Oct 19 04:15:04 2016
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 19 2016 - 04:15:05 EEST