Subject: Re: [linux-audio-dev] Audio program installs
From: Andy Wingo (wingo_AT_pobox.com)
Date: Mon Mar 25 2002 - 17:17:46 EET
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Fred Gleason wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> > such users should not be installing software that is only available
> > from CVS.
>
> Hmm. I think I see your point, but I wonder if you've considered all the
> broader picture. I'm getting set to start porting some of my stuff over
> to Jack in the next week or so. I'm not particularly interested in the
> internals of how it works (except insofar as that may drive the design of
> the client applications), I just want to *use* it. I suspect I'm not the
> only one in this situation. I don't have tons of time to spend poring
> over source code and build configurations -- there are apps to write! If
> getting Jack adopted as a standard in the LAD is a goal, I think it'd be
> wise to make things as easy for app developers as possible.
We're working on binary packages, which seems to be what you're asking
for. If on the other hand you're just asking for more frequent tarball
releases, that's probably possible. In any case, jackit-devel is the
place to be :)
> Just my $.02. Thanks for listening.
and here are mine :)
wingo
ps. we need someone to write up a redhat spec for jack. post a note to
jackit-devel (members only) if you're interested. thanks.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Mar 25 2002 - 17:07:19 EET