Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Virtual Mixing Desk
From: Russell Hanaghan (hanaghan_AT_starband.net)
Date: Sun Jul 18 2004 - 08:22:03 EEST
On Sat, 2004-07-17 at 14:40, Stanley Jaddoe wrote:
> On Saturday 17 July 2004 19:10, Russell Hanaghan wrote:
> > IMHO, there is nothing more appropriate for these tasks than the Ardour
> > mixer interface. As I state usually in this line of useage, it is a
> > massive underuse of Ardour and all of it's other capabilities but I use
> > it's mixer interface live for gigs and it is all of the things you want
> > plus a LOT more when you have the need.
> IMHO, a harddisk recorder and mixing desk are two seperate functions. I really
> hope Mr. Davis agrees and will split the mixing part from the harddisk
> recording part.
> The mixing part of Ardour could then be developed as a seperate 'full fledged'
> JACK mixing desk. Of course, this seperate mixer can be reused by the
> harddisk recording part of Ardour.
Kind of pointless IMO. If you don't record....it's NOT a hard disk
recorder. And the mixer HAS all the functionality of a conventional
mixing console. I don't think Ardour takes up much more in the way of
resources if your not recording to HD.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Sun Jul 18 2004 - 08:28:09 EEST